GF predictions

Views: 1948 Posts: 43
Rare
wrote on 23-Aug-24 09:38

Res WPH

1sts WRR to complete the first treble 

Guess man
wrote on 23-Aug-24 13:03

Rovers for both. 

also what's the treble?

Treble?
wrote on 23-Aug-24 13:38

Rare wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Res WPH

>1sts WRR to complete the first treble 


------------------------------------------

Rovers didn't win Gilmour this year

Unless you're talking about something else?

Rare
wrote on 23-Aug-24 14:41

Treble? wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Rare wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Res WPH

>>1sts WRR to complete the first treble 

>
------------------------------------------

>Rovers didn't win Gilmour this year

>Unless you're talking about something else?


------------------------------------------

 

The pre-season friendly we had against our ressies side 

Swanee
wrote on 24-Aug-24 11:15

Who are the referees, that will always make a difference ?

 

 

Results?
wrote on 24-Aug-24 22:27

Results and match summaries?

GF
wrote on 24-Aug-24 22:40

RG 3-3 Rovers win on penalties 4-3

FG  2-1 Rovers 

Neutral
wrote on 24-Aug-24 23:32

Reserves was a great occasion. Free flowing football and both teams should have put away more chances than what they did. 
West Penno particularly will be disappointed in not sealing the game in the first half. Hot weather forcing constant changes and West Ryde gained more control in the midfield. 
The crucial penalty miss in the shootout from the West Penno player will haunt him forever. Cleared the fence and some more. Horrendous miss but that's football. 

First Grade was more conservative in style in the first half in fact nothing to note that happened in that half. Game opened up slightly in the second with a late penalty call in extra time to seal the game. 

Want to say, super impressed by the officials for both games. Both are familiar in the PL space but great to see young referees get rewarded and referee top matches on the biggest occasions. 

Starving
wrote on 24-Aug-24 23:57

Where's my Door Dash? :(

Lion Tamer
wrote on 24-Aug-24 23:58

Are lions still lions? End of an era 

Starving
wrote on 25-Aug-24 00:03

Where's my Door Dash? :(

Double babyyyy
wrote on 25-Aug-24 00:03

Forum is awfully quiet now... funny that.

What was that about choking?

HAHA 

next year fellas!

 

The best was door Dash trying to gee up after ressies game hahahah.

No deliveries today?

Lion Tamer
wrote on 25-Aug-24 03:12

Are lions still lions? End of an era 

Well done
wrote on 25-Aug-24 06:40

Congratulations to west Ryde.

 

Agree
wrote on 25-Aug-24 08:45

Neutral wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Reserves was a great occasion. Free flowing football and both teams should have put away more chances than what they did. 
West Penno particularly will be disappointed in not sealing the game in the first half. Hot weather forcing constant changes and West Ryde gained more control in the midfield. 
The crucial penalty miss in the shootout from the West Penno player will haunt him forever. Cleared the fence and some more. Horrendous miss but that's football. 

>First Grade was more conservative in style in the first half in fact nothing to note that happened in that half. Game opened up slightly in the second with a late penalty call in extra time to seal the game. 

>Want to say, super impressed by the officials for both games. Both are familiar in the PL space but great to see young referees get rewarded and referee top matches on the biggest occasions. 


------------------------------------------


You wonder whether First Grade played more passively given Ressies went hard out and conceded something like 4 goals in 20 minutes. Game opened up too much in Ressies and both right backs for each club got a little found out when the wingers were 1 on 1.

Dash was probably worst player on the pitch for the Ressies game. 

West Penno will feel down particularly in First Grade of not winning. Couple of big chances that went begging. A real stalemate of a game though. Best two teams almost couldn't be separated. 

Agree with refs. Heard the chick does W-League and you can tell. All cards were justified and handball at the end was the most blatant handball one could give.
Reserves ref knew how the game should be played. Correct me if Im wrong but I think there were more goals than fouls in the first half. 

Huge congrats to West Ryde. After disappointing finals they have gone through in the last couple of years, they finally have the reward they have reaped. West Penno gotta have their head up high too. They have lost some great players over the years and still manage to be the standard of the comp.

Dash
wrote on 25-Aug-24 12:22

Dash. Dash. Dash . Dash. Dash. Dash

Ressies Man of Match
wrote on 25-Aug-24 17:55

Tbh, how did No 11. in the Ressies game get the MOM. Forgot he even played the game until he was called up for the medal. There were definitely better players. No 21. in Ressies was good I reckon. 

No. 21
wrote on 26-Aug-24 08:30

Ressies Man of Match wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Tbh, how did No 11. in the Ressies game get the MOM. Forgot he even played the game until he was called up for the medal. There were definitely better players. No 21. in Ressies was good I reckon. 


------------------------------------------

 

Agree. No.21 ripped it up on the left hand side all game. Every run at the RB he won 1:1. 2 assists (one beauty through ball for the third goal). A little surprised that he wasn't MOTM. 

Crazy
wrote on 26-Aug-24 08:37

Wr no 11 benched for the entire 2nd half awarded MOTM that's crazy

No. 21 wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Ressies Man of Match wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Tbh, how did No 11. in the Ressies game get the MOM. Forgot he even played the game until he was called up for the medal. There were definitely better players. No 21. in Ressies was good I reckon. 

>
------------------------------------------

>Agree. No.21 ripped it up on the left hand side all game. Every run at the RB he won 1:1. 2 assists (one beauty through ball for the third goal). A little surprised that he wasn't MOTM. 


------------------------------------------

Grain of salt
wrote on 26-Aug-24 09:03

It's an arbitrary, subjective award decided by 2 semi-senile men who probably struggle to remember what day it is. I wouldn't read too much into it. 

FOTM
wrote on 26-Aug-24 09:35

I can tell you who were the flops of the match...

 

Rovers keeper - first and third goal he is in no man's land. That first goal should never ever happen in a Reserves game let alone a final. 

West Penno RB (No. 12) - had a game to forget. Constantly made to look like a dog chasing his tail. Could not contain No.21 and eventually had to be taken off. Was at fault for the first two goals. Ended up in what looked like an extra man in midfield to contain No.21. A day to forget. 

West Penno striker (the infamous Dash Dash) - apart from a classy heading finish, bloke was invisible throughout the game and was 3 steps slower of the pace of the game. Got outmuscled in every 50/50 challenge. His days are over.

 

Greatest flop though has to be the association - imagine delaying games because of parking. Idiotic stuff that

 

 

Sky High
wrote on 26-Aug-24 09:55

FOTM wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>I can tell you who were the flops of the match...

>Rovers keeper - first and third goal he is in no man's land. That first goal should never ever happen in a Reserves game let alone a final. 

>West Penno RB (No. 12) - had a game to forget. Constantly made to look like a dog chasing his tail. Could not contain No.21 and eventually had to be taken off. Was at fault for the first two goals. Ended up in what looked like an extra man in midfield to contain No.21. A day to forget. 

>West Penno striker (the infamous Dash Dash) - apart from a classy heading finish, bloke was invisible throughout the game and was 3 steps slower of the pace of the game. Got outmuscled in every 50/50 challenge. His days are over.

>Greatest flop though has to be the association - imagine delaying games because of parking. Idiotic stuff that


------------------------------------------


Surely a mention has to be that poor attempt of a penalty kick that landed in another planet?

 

snowdrop
wrote on 26-Aug-24 10:03

//// Greatest flop though has to be the association - imagine delaying games because of parking. Idiotic stuff that

 

 

haha , shld hv taken a video on that car park jam

Caught out
wrote on 26-Aug-24 10:37

snowdrop wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>//// Greatest flop though has to be the association - imagine delaying games because of parking. Idiotic stuff that

>haha , shld hv taken a video on that car park jam


------------------------------------------

 

Christie carpark is always full on Grand Final day. No idea why it caught everyone out on surprise... Better management is needed to ensure the same problem doesn't happen for the Victory game...

confused
wrote on 26-Aug-24 11:54

Swanee wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Who are the referees, that will always make a difference ?


------------------------------------------

 

don't get all the praise for the refs. they just did their jobs. what were people expecting?

 

don't get how referees should make any difference to a game

Tromboli
wrote on 26-Aug-24 12:06

>Christie carpark is always full on Grand Final day. No idea why it caught everyone out on surprise... Better management is needed to ensure the same problem doesn't happen for the Victory game...------------------------------------------

 

 

 

its gonna be chockablock on versus Victory. I m sure their band of merrymen will be travelling here

Refs
wrote on 26-Aug-24 12:16

confused wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Swanee wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Who are the referees, that will always make a difference ?

>> 

>> 

>
------------------------------------------

>don't get all the praise for the refs. they just did their jobs. what were people expecting?

>don't get how referees should make any difference to a game


------------------------------------------

 

Because they did their job well so that both games flowed - with the exception of 1st that was boring on the players part. Everyone's quick to slaughter when they don't do a good job so what's the issue with saying well done when they did a good job? 

Lions
wrote on 26-Aug-24 13:30

confused wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Swanee wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Who are the referees, that will always make a difference ?

>> 

>> 

>
------------------------------------------

>don't get all the praise for the refs. they just did their jobs. what were people expecting?

>don't get how referees should make any difference to a game


------------------------------------------

 

You must not play because as a player I reckon we've had more crap refs than good refs. And for a GF, you appreciate when you know you have a good ref doing your game. 

And it's not like they both had a good game for their GF. They have both been quality of the years. First grade ref we saw ref the FG semi last year. Quality. The year before she did us again and quality. As for the reserves, had him over the last couple of years and has always had same consistent approach to games. Have never had an issue with him.

Consistency. That's all you want from refs and we've got that. 

Last 3 years First Grade refs have had the best refs reffing FG (Reiddy, Juice and the W-League lady). Can't ask more...

Pat McAfee
wrote on 26-Aug-24 14:15

Lion Tamer wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Are lions still lions? End of an era 


------------------------------------------

Big call to say end of an era. Ressies WPH took WWR all the way to the end of the season only finishing 2nd on goal difference and then only loosing on penalties. 

First grade are still a strong side also, unlcuky not to get the title this year and missing out on the GF win but thats football. WWR is the only team in recent history to threaten them. 

I takes a lot to be dominant year in year out. Everyone gives WPH a lot of stick when they lose but thats what happens when you are at the top of the mountian for so long, you are just expected to win. 

Congrats to WWR getting it done in both grades, lets see if they can back it up next year or will this just be a one and done?

Recruitment
wrote on 26-Aug-24 15:51

Rovers had a strong recruitment this season. Lots of players missed out or barely got a run in the final when you had a fully fit squad ready to play. 

Be interesting to see whether a couple of players leave to get better bang for their buck. 

West Penno have lots of good youth teams coming through so I don't expect them to digress significantly. 

The bar between Rovers & Lions and the rest of the comp is staggering though. At full capacity, they demolished their semi final opponents and there's nothing to suggest that North Ryde, Epping and Putney will make any effort to compete at the highest levels. We will see...

 

Congrats to both clubs for their efforts. Agree also that the refs were class. In fact I was watching the two Super League GFs from time to time and thought the SL officials were also class. Looks like well thought out allocations from the association. 

lets be real
wrote on 26-Aug-24 16:44

I wonder if this forum realises this is easily the weakest assosciation league across NSW by a long shot... quality of football leaves nothing to be desired 

Really real
wrote on 26-Aug-24 17:40

It's not though? 

Lion Tamer
wrote on 26-Aug-24 18:27

Pat McAfee wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Lion Tamer wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Are lions still lions? End of an era 

>
------------------------------------------

>Big call to say end of an era. Ressies WPH took WWR all the way to the end of the season only finishing 2nd on goal difference and then only loosing on penalties. 

>First grade are still a strong side also, unlcuky not to get the title this year and missing out on the GF win but thats football. WWR is the only team in recent history to threaten them. 

>I takes a lot to be dominant year in year out. Everyone gives WPH a lot of stick when they lose but thats what happens when you are at the top of the mountian for so long, you are just expected to win. 

>Congrats to WWR getting it done in both grades, lets see if they can back it up next year or will this just be a one and done?


------------------------------------------

Ok nerd 

Explain
wrote on 26-Aug-24 19:29

Not trolling ya but explain "Lions unlucky to not get FG title"

As close to 6th place as #1 (7 points) played WR four times lost 3 won 1

 

Pat McAfee wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Lion Tamer wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Are lions still lions? End of an era 

>
------------------------------------------

>Big call to say end of an era. Ressies WPH took WWR all the way to the end of the season only finishing 2nd on goal difference and then only loosing on penalties. 

>First grade are still a strong side also, unlcuky not to get the title this year and missing out on the GF win but thats football. WWR is the only team in recent history to threaten them. 

>I takes a lot to be dominant year in year out. Everyone gives WPH a lot of stick when they lose but thats what happens when you are at the top of the mountian for so long, you are just expected to win. 

>Congrats to WWR getting it done in both grades, lets see if they can back it up next year or will this just be a one and done?


------------------------------------------

Yawn
wrote on 26-Aug-24 21:41

lets be real wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>I wonder if this forum realises this is easily the weakest assosciation league across NSW by a long shot... quality of football leaves nothing to be desired 


------------------------------------------

 

ah yeah definitely. Wwr and wph go ok they're not world beaters but the fact that there's a big gap to the rest says the comp is average at best. 

Lion Tamer
wrote on 26-Aug-24 21:41

Pat McAfee wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Lion Tamer wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Are lions still lions? End of an era 

>
------------------------------------------

>Big call to say end of an era. Ressies WPH took WWR all the way to the end of the season only finishing 2nd on goal difference and then only loosing on penalties. 

>First grade are still a strong side also, unlcuky not to get the title this year and missing out on the GF win but thats football. WWR is the only team in recent history to threaten them. 

>I takes a lot to be dominant year in year out. Everyone gives WPH a lot of stick when they lose but thats what happens when you are at the top of the mountian for so long, you are just expected to win. 

>Congrats to WWR getting it done in both grades, lets see if they can back it up next year or will this just be a one and done?


------------------------------------------

Ok nerd 

Well
wrote on 27-Aug-24 06:31

lets be real wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>I wonder if this forum realises this is easily the weakest assosciation league across NSW by a long shot... quality of football leaves nothing to be desired 


------------------------------------------

Weren't west penno CoC runners up 2x? And it's not like they destroyed every other team in this comp to get there so I think you're full of shit. 
That being said, the real test is how WRR go in this years CoC. 

Pfft
wrote on 27-Aug-24 09:20

Well wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>lets be real wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>I wonder if this forum realises this is easily the weakest assosciation league across NSW by a long shot... quality of football leaves nothing to be desired 

>
------------------------------------------

>Weren't west penno CoC runners up 2x? And it's not like they destroyed every other team in this comp to get there so I think you're full of shit. 
That being said, the real test is how WRR go in this years CoC. 


------------------------------------------

 

lol wph won the comp by a country mile when they had good coc runs. The comp's depth is rubbish in comparison to many others. Will never match the likes of eastern suburbs and manly. 

Pat McAfee
wrote on 27-Aug-24 11:57

Explain wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Not trolling ya but explain "Lions unlucky to not get FG title"

>As close to 6th place as #1 (7 points) played WR four times lost 3 won 1

>Pat McAfee wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Lion Tamer wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>>Are lions still lions? End of an era 

>>
------------------------------------------

>>Big call to say end of an era. Ressies WPH took WWR all the way to the end of the season only finishing 2nd on goal difference and then only loosing on penalties. 

>>First grade are still a strong side also, unlcuky not to get the title this year and missing out on the GF win but thats football. WWR is the only team in recent history to threaten them. 

>>I takes a lot to be dominant year in year out. Everyone gives WPH a lot of stick when they lose but thats what happens when you are at the top of the mountian for so long, you are just expected to win. 

>>Congrats to WWR getting it done in both grades, lets see if they can back it up next year or will this just be a one and done?

>
------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------

I feel like any team that comes second place and losses a GF in the last 5mins of extra time is unlcuky not to win it. Someimes the ball doesnt bounce your way and sometimes it does

 

Regarding the 3-1 win/lose, pre season comp WPH have historically not done well in it. The 4-1 win to WWR no idea what happened there with WPH and then the final was only 2-1, lost in extra time but still a close game. 

Short memory
wrote on 27-Aug-24 12:55

Pfft wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Well wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>lets be real wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>>I wonder if this forum realises this is easily the weakest assosciation league across NSW by a long shot... quality of football leaves nothing to be desired 

>>
------------------------------------------

>>Weren't west penno CoC runners up 2x? And it's not like they destroyed every other team in this comp to get there so I think you're full of shit. 
That being said, the real test is how WRR go in this years CoC. 

>
------------------------------------------

>lol wph won the comp by a country mile when they had good coc runs. The comp's depth is rubbish in comparison to many others. Will never match the likes of eastern suburbs and manly. 


------------------------------------------

No they didn't, rovers pushed them till the end for the premiership...

Gary Player
wrote on 28-Aug-24 11:24

GHFA 0 Melb VIc 4

 

odds for Vic dropping every hour

Sportstab
wrote on 29-Aug-24 12:23

Gary Player wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>GHFA 0 Melb VIc 4

>odds for Vic dropping every hour


------------------------------------------

Nice collect?

Gary Player
wrote on 29-Aug-24 13:33

Sportstab wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Gary Player wrote:
------------------------------------------
>>GHFA 0 Melb VIc 4

>>odds for Vic dropping every hour

>
------------------------------------------
>Nice collect?
------------------------------------------


//

no tmuch made 80 bucks on a small outlay - enuff for a slab & pack of peanuts

Author:
Subject: