Reminder Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just a reminder tigers haven't been beaten in 13
> rounds. Thank you.
Incorrect
Reminder Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just a reminder tigers haven't been beaten in 13
> rounds. Thank you.
You must be at the boozer off your bonce we have only played 12 games
Fatfield Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> phoenix Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > . Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > phoenix Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Rattled
> > >
> > >
> > > Shut up Hatfield
> >
> > Rattled
>
> The only thing rattled is the suspension on your
> car you obese slob
You have crossed the line here "Fatfield"!!
this is not banter, its personal.
Not called for and unnessary
eagles eat ravens Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ravens were lucky to win on saturday, had three
> shots on goal all game and scored 3. they probably
> had about 14% possession and the only reason they
> held on to the lead was because we had a bullcrap
> send off on the second half. even with that send
> off we were still all over them creating way more
> chances. easy to see why ravens are so bad this
> year i guess we just got them on their lucky day
Since when was a 100% shot-to-goal ratio a sign of a bad team? If anything I'd assume the team that had tons of shots and only managed 1 goal the worse of the two. But whatever helps you sleep at night I guess.
ravens were lucky to win on saturday, had three shots on goal all game and scored 3. they probably had about 14% possession and the only reason they held on to the lead was because we had a bullcrap send off on the second half. even with that send off we were still all over them creating way more chances. easy to see why ravens are so bad this year i guess we just got them on their lucky day
who cares about a battle of the poo
both ravens and normo and a guarenteed 3 points to any good team
why is noone talking about the eastwood derby
the big blob mooyus returned to the score sheet and the olympic diver turner scored as well meaning he is finally over a goal every 2 game ratio
good times for the tigers
Ummm Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eagles eat ravens Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ravens were lucky to win on saturday, had three
> > shots on goal all game and scored 3. they
> probably
> > had about 14% possession and the only reason
> they
> > held on to the lead was because we had a
> bullcrap
> > send off on the second half. even with that
> send
> > off we were still all over them creating way
> more
> > chances. easy to see why ravens are so bad this
> > year i guess we just got them on their lucky
> day
>
>
> Since when was a 100% shot-to-goal ratio a sign of
> a bad team? If anything I'd assume the team that
> had tons of shots and only managed 1 goal the
> worse of the two. But whatever helps you sleep at
> night I guess.
Thanks, i guess it helps....
Mac Uni lost 1-2 in both Reserve and 1st grade. Surprisingly, they should've won the 1st grade game. Eastwood were lucky to escape with a win after trailing.
Horko
wrote on 01-Jul-17 16:03Hawks v Rangers
Ressies
0-4
Firsts
6-1
Matthews
wrote on 01-Jul-17 16:09wph v wrr Res 5-0 1st 5-1
phoenix
wrote on 01-Jul-17 17:01Rattled
Horse
wrote on 01-Jul-17 17:03EEW v STA Res 0-3 1sts 2-1
Timmy Lane #23
wrote on 01-Jul-17 17:04Eew v Flaccids 0-3 2-1 Special mention to myself, I'm completely rubbish.
Ekalb
wrote on 01-Jul-17 17:04Hey TG, fuck you and your parrots! Love blake
MAC UNI
wrote on 01-Jul-17 17:05Reserve Grade Pen 1-1 Mac 1st Grade Pen 3-1 Mac
.
wrote on 01-Jul-17 17:06phoenix Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Rattled Shut up Hatfield
NMH vs RAV
wrote on 01-Jul-17 17:07NMH vs RAV Res 3-0 Firsts 1-3
timmykruse
wrote on 01-Jul-17 18:09Looks like normo now putting all their eggs in the Ressies basket
Tables
wrote on 01-Jul-17 19:05Tables. Do it.
Reminder
wrote on 02-Jul-17 00:05Just a reminder tigers haven't been beaten in 13 rounds. Thank you.
Lol
wrote on 02-Jul-17 03:01Reminder Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Just a reminder tigers haven't been beaten in 13 > rounds. Thank you. Incorrect
phoenix
wrote on 02-Jul-17 06:05. Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > phoenix Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Rattled > > > Shut up Hatfield Rattled
Boozer
wrote on 02-Jul-17 07:09Reminder Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Just a reminder tigers haven't been beaten in 13 > rounds. Thank you. You must be at the boozer off your bonce we have only played 12 games
phoenix
wrote on 02-Jul-17 08:04And a half
Rofl
wrote on 02-Jul-17 10:06Very quiet from the ranger girls...
Ner
wrote on 02-Jul-17 11:07Had a shit game yesterday, no point making excuses. Well played by hawks
Fatfield
wrote on 02-Jul-17 12:02phoenix Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > . Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > phoenix Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Rattled > > > > > > Shut up Hatfield > > Rattled The only thing rattled is the suspension on your car you obese slob
.
wrote on 02-Jul-17 12:09phoenix Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > And a half Shut up Hatfield
brisc
wrote on 02-Jul-17 17:07Fatfield Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > phoenix Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > . Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > phoenix Wrote: > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ----- > > > > Rattled > > > > > > > > > Shut up Hatfield > > > > Rattled > > The only thing rattled is the suspension on your > car you obese slob You have crossed the line here "Fatfield"!! this is not banter, its personal. Not called for and unnessary
Agree
wrote on 02-Jul-17 23:05brisc Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Fatfield Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > phoenix Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > . Wrote: > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ----- > > > > phoenix Wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > Rattled > > > > > > > > > > > > Shut up Hatfield > > > > > > Rattled > > > > The only thing rattled is the suspension on > your > > car you obese slob > > You have crossed the line here "Fatfield"!! > this is not banter, its personal. > Not called for and unnessary I agree, what has his suspension ever done to you?
Frankenstein
wrote on 03-Jul-17 01:01brisc Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Fatfield Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > phoenix Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > . Wrote: > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ----- > > > > phoenix Wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > Rattled > > > > > > > > > > > > Shut up Hatfield > > > > > > Rattled > > > > The only thing rattled is the suspension on > your > > car you obese slob > > You have crossed the line here "Fatfield"!! > this is not banter, its personal. > Not called for and unnessary Sorry, too personal?
Ummm
wrote on 03-Jul-17 09:00eagles eat ravens Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ravens were lucky to win on saturday, had three > shots on goal all game and scored 3. they probably > had about 14% possession and the only reason they > held on to the lead was because we had a bullcrap > send off on the second half. even with that send > off we were still all over them creating way more > chances. easy to see why ravens are so bad this > year i guess we just got them on their lucky day Since when was a 100% shot-to-goal ratio a sign of a bad team? If anything I'd assume the team that had tons of shots and only managed 1 goal the worse of the two. But whatever helps you sleep at night I guess.
Parkdabus
wrote on 03-Jul-17 09:07Normo are crap and have been for years.. too defensive and not enough attacking. You need to change your game plan. It isn't working.
eagles eat ravens
wrote on 03-Jul-17 09:08ravens were lucky to win on saturday, had three shots on goal all game and scored 3. they probably had about 14% possession and the only reason they held on to the lead was because we had a bullcrap send off on the second half. even with that send off we were still all over them creating way more chances. easy to see why ravens are so bad this year i guess we just got them on their lucky day
mooyus
wrote on 03-Jul-17 14:08who cares about a battle of the poo both ravens and normo and a guarenteed 3 points to any good team why is noone talking about the eastwood derby the big blob mooyus returned to the score sheet and the olympic diver turner scored as well meaning he is finally over a goal every 2 game ratio good times for the tigers
Frankenstein
wrote on 03-Jul-17 21:05Ummm Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > eagles eat ravens Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > ravens were lucky to win on saturday, had three > > shots on goal all game and scored 3. they > probably > > had about 14% possession and the only reason > they > > held on to the lead was because we had a > bullcrap > > send off on the second half. even with that > send > > off we were still all over them creating way > more > > chances. easy to see why ravens are so bad this > > year i guess we just got them on their lucky > day > > > Since when was a 100% shot-to-goal ratio a sign of > a bad team? If anything I'd assume the team that > had tons of shots and only managed 1 goal the > worse of the two. But whatever helps you sleep at > night I guess. Thanks, i guess it helps....
St Tittle favourite
wrote on 05-Jul-17 22:04Anyone know/care what the result was in tonight's catch up fixture?
Joker
wrote on 06-Jul-17 00:02Mac Uni lost 1-2 in both Reserve and 1st grade. Surprisingly, they should've won the 1st grade game. Eastwood were lucky to escape with a win after trailing.
Pamela Anderson
wrote on 06-Jul-17 06:07St Andrews 2-1
tommy lee
wrote on 06-Jul-17 07:09woodies are defs not going to be in finals footy if they can only beat mac uni 2-1
Wowsers
wrote on 06-Jul-17 13:03wow, And it was mid uni break with all of uni's good players at the university games...