Round 4 Results

Views: 1692 Posts: 33
Covers
wrote on 27-Apr-24 17:25

Wph v St Pats

Ressies

3-1 Wph

Firsts

4-2 Wph

Femboy Phil
wrote on 27-Apr-24 17:28

Ressies

Normo 1-0 Rovers

1st grade

Normo 2-2 Rovers

The Big Dog
wrote on 27-Apr-24 17:40

MAC vs. EEW 

Ressies

2-1

Firsts

1-1

Putt
wrote on 27-Apr-24 17:47

Res 7-1 penno

firsts 4-2 Putney 

8-1
wrote on 27-Apr-24 17:57

Putt wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Res 7-1 penno

>firsts 4-2 Putney 


------------------------------------------

Bye bye bye
wrote on 27-Apr-24 19:18

North Ryde are going downnnnnnnnn

Wow
wrote on 27-Apr-24 19:54

EEW n Rovers dropping points any report on the matches?

Rovers @ Normo Reporter
wrote on 27-Apr-24 20:17

Tough game, both teams looked exhausted throughout. Rovers jag an early goal from a goalkeeping error and bad bounce. Score a second off a corner and go in to half time 2-0. Second half didn't take chances to make it 3 or 4, and hung in for a 2-0. Normo threatened early first half and then faded after 20 mins or so, no real shots on goal after the first 20. 85 min free kick gets deflected into the top bin, own goal. Burst of energy from Normo sees them push for an equaliser, which they get off of a short corner to the back post at 90+2. More a case of points dropped for Rovers probably overall after failing to take their chances second half. Rovers keeper didn't have a save to make all second half, as Normo registered none (or maybe one) shots on target, other than the headed goal in stoppage time

Tiger tiger
wrote on 27-Apr-24 20:17

Wow wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>EEW n Rovers dropping points any report on the matches?


------------------------------------------

EEW had several players away and were the dominant team for the most part just couldn't capitalise.

Others may have seen differently but that's just me. 

Awesome
wrote on 27-Apr-24 20:21

Sounds like cracker games thanks.

Liar dickhead
wrote on 27-Apr-24 20:46

Tiger tiger wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Wow wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>EEW n Rovers dropping points any report on the matches?

>
------------------------------------------

>EEW had several players away and were the dominant team for the most part just couldn't capitalise.

>Others may have seen differently but that's just me. 


------------------------------------------

 

EEW had 14 players today of the same 15 who beat WPH last week. 
"Several players away"

Tiger Tiger
wrote on 27-Apr-24 20:51

Liar dickhead wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Tiger tiger wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Wow wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>>EEW n Rovers dropping points any report on the matches?

>>
------------------------------------------

>>EEW had several players away and were the dominant team for the most part just couldn't capitalise.

>>Others may have seen differently but that's just me. 

>
------------------------------------------

>EEW had 14 players today of the same 15 who beat WPH last week. 
"Several players away"


------------------------------------------

They've had players out for weeks you nonce

Travel Lodge
wrote on 27-Apr-24 21:01

So a whole bunch of players have been away for the first few weeks of the season? Gotcha

Cry me a river
wrote on 27-Apr-24 21:11

Tiger Tiger wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Liar dickhead wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Tiger tiger wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>>Wow wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>>>EEW n Rovers dropping points any report on the matches?

>>>
------------------------------------------

>>>EEW had several players away and were the dominant team for the most part just couldn't capitalise.

>>>Others may have seen differently but that's just me. 

>>
------------------------------------------

>> 

>>EEW had 14 players today of the same 15 who beat WPH last week. 
"Several players away"

>
------------------------------------------

>They've had players out for weeks you nonce


------------------------------------------

womp womp

Dr Phil.
wrote on 27-Apr-24 22:45

Putney need to up their referee retainer,  nothing was going their way so they had two players have a lay down in protest complaining they hurt their fannies. 

 

Dr Phil.
wrote on 27-Apr-24 22:46

Putney need to up their referee retainer,  nothing was going their way so they had two players have a lay down in protest complaining they hurt their fannies. 

 

Pen
wrote on 28-Apr-24 08:40

Dr Phil. wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Putney need to up their referee retainer,  nothing was going their way so they had two players have a lay down in protest complaining they hurt their fannies. 


------------------------------------------

Didnt impact the game because Putney were deserved winners but that first half refereeing performance in FG was horrendous and for both sides. Second half was different and thankfully so.

 

 

Sad old Penno
wrote on 28-Apr-24 11:31

Penno looked like one of the most woeful football sides I've ever seen yesterday afternoon.

 

after their dominant ressies side battered putney 8-1, the first graders could barely string a pass together in the midfield, let alone make a tackle.

funniest thing was their centre backs with some absolute howlers at the back, on their heels the whole game.

 

penno are lucky north ryde are in the comp, cause otherwise they'd be going down down down

Graham “Putney Ranger” Smith
wrote on 28-Apr-24 13:15

8-1 wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Putt wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Res 7-1 penno

>>firsts 4-2 Putney 

>
------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------

watched my son play ressies for Putney, bloody refs costing us again, I swear if we could just once get some unbiased refereeing in this competition we could have had, for example, 7 more goals to change the result.

 

kind regards, Graham Smith

Graham “Putney Ranger” Smith
wrote on 28-Apr-24 13:51

8-1 wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Putt wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Res 7-1 penno

>>firsts 4-2 Putney 

>
------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------

watched my son play ressies for Putney, bloody refs costing us again, I swear if we could just once get some unbiased refereeing in this competition we could have had, for example, 7 more goals to change the result.

 

kind regards, Graham Smith

general
wrote on 28-Apr-24 13:56

Graham “Putney Ranger” Smith wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>8-1 wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Putt wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>>Res 7-1 penno

>>>firsts 4-2 Putney 

>>
------------------------------------------

>
------------------------------------------

>watched my son play ressies for Putney, bloody refs costing us again, I swear if we could just once get some unbiased refereeing in this competition we could have had, for example, 7 more goals to change the result.

>kind regards, Graham Smith


------------------------------------------

disrespectfully they couldnt put more than 3 normal passes together before they lost it

Trolls
wrote on 28-Apr-24 14:01

keep trolling lads 

Nonsense
wrote on 28-Apr-24 16:25

Does anyone post anything worthy in here or have anything constructive to say about any of the matches or is it just full of trolls with nothing better to do?

Onlooker
wrote on 28-Apr-24 16:50

Sad old Penno wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Penno looked like one of the most woeful football sides I've ever seen yesterday afternoon.

>after their dominant ressies side battered putney 8-1, the first graders could barely string a pass together in the midfield, let alone make a tackle.

>funniest thing was their centre backs with some absolute howlers at the back, on their heels the whole game.

>penno are lucky north ryde are in the comp, cause otherwise they'd be going down down down


------------------------------------------

I'd disagree with this observation. 

Thought Penno was able to put more passes together than Putney. Thought both teams used the full width of the pitch well and the wingers particularly were relied on heavily for attacks. 

Pennos CB costed them 3 goals with poor passes and Putneys quick counters got them the 3 points. 

Agree with one of the earlier comments, some strange refereeing occurred. Non existent back pass, the softest penalty given and one of Pennos goals you could argue there was a full on push on the Putney defender. No flow to the game whatsoever. 

There must not be any new refereeing talent coming through because the same refs doing first grade are the same ones doing it 15 years ago. 

Dr Phil.
wrote on 28-Apr-24 18:59

Putney need to up their referee retainer,  nothing was going their way so they had two players have a lay down in protest complaining they hurt their fannies. 

 

In the bin
wrote on 29-Apr-24 14:55

Shout out to St Pats captain who gave the ref a mouthful at 2-1 up against West Penno, then watched it turn into a 2-4 loss while he was in the bin.

 

He's normally better than that, but its still dumb. 

Roy Drage
wrote on 29-Apr-24 15:10

In the bin wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Shout out to St Pats captain who gave the ref a mouthful at 2-1 up against West Penno, then watched it turn into a 2-4 loss while he was in the bin.

>He's normally better than that, but its still dumb. 


------------------------------------------

 

Is that Jayden? 
no, he's not normally better than that

North Ryde
wrote on 29-Apr-24 16:16

North Ryde won't even get a point this season.

 

They simply cannot compete with the big boys of Premier League.

 

Gonna be a long season. 

Daddy chill
wrote on 29-Apr-24 17:49

4 games in relax 

Tiger joke
wrote on 30-Apr-24 08:55

Tiger Tiger wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>Liar dickhead wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>Tiger tiger wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>>Wow wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>>>>EEW n Rovers dropping points any report on the matches?

>>>
------------------------------------------

>>>EEW had several players away and were the dominant team for the most part just couldn't capitalise.

>>>Others may have seen differently but that's just me. 

>>
------------------------------------------

>> 

>>EEW had 14 players today of the same 15 who beat WPH last week. 
"Several players away"

>
------------------------------------------

>They've had players out for weeks you nonce


------------------------------------------

March 2 vs Saints (8 weeks ago)

13 players in that game which played Mac. 

Joke of a club always making excuses 

Jokers
wrote on 01-May-24 08:50

Do you really think Tigers come here talking about how many players are out ? Everyone has a few players out. 

 

 

 

 

As if
wrote on 02-May-24 21:11

Were the EEW players missing because they were unavailable or because they were missing in action?

Huh?
wrote on 03-May-24 11:41

Bye bye bye wrote:
------------------------------------------
>

>North Ryde are going downnnnnnnnn


------------------------------------------

wait till we pump everyone second round.

Author:
Subject: